Build a dining-decision micro-app in 7 days that runs from your clipboard
micro-appstemplatesautomation

Build a dining-decision micro-app in 7 days that runs from your clipboard

cclipboard
2026-01-21
9 min read
Advertisement

Turn messy group chat suggestions into ranked restaurant picks. Build a 7-day dining micro-app that runs from your clipboard with prompt-engineered LLM scoring.

Stop scrolling group chat chaos — build a dining-decision micro-app from your clipboard in 7 days

Group chat: dozens of restaurant suggestions, five conflicting vibes, zero decisions. If that sounds familiar, you need a tool that turns messy chat snippets into ranked restaurant picks you can paste anywhere. This guide shows how to recreate Rebecca Yu’s rapid dining concept as a reusable micro-app template that reads group chat snippets from your clipboard, scores options with a prompt-engineered LLM, and outputs ranked picks — ready for copy-paste or share links.

Why now (2026)? The trend you can’t ignore

Since late 2024 and accelerating through 2025–2026, two platform shifts made micro-apps practical for creators and small teams:

  • On-device and privacy-first LLMs and secure APIs let developers run inference locally or in trusted serverless environments for fast, private scoring.
  • Clipboard-first workflows have matured — browser clipboard APIs and OS-level sync tooling make it simple to grab chat snippets from any app and paste curated output anywhere.

That means you can prototype a working dining-decision micro-app in days, not months — no heavy backend, and friendly to both developers and no-code builders. If you need guidance on hosting choices, see hybrid edge and regional hosting strategies to balance latency and cost.

What you’ll ship in 7 days

By the end of the week you’ll have a reusable micro-app template that:

  • Reads raw group chat text from the clipboard
  • Parses suggestions, deduplicates, and enriches entries (optional geolocation)
  • Sends structured data to an LLM with a prompt-engineered scoring rubric
  • Returns a ranked list of restaurants (JSON + human text) you can paste back to chat
  • Includes options for privacy, on-device inference, and no-code integration

7-day rapid plan — what to build each day

  1. Day 1 — Project scaffold & goals: Define signals (price, distance, cuisine, dietary, vibe), choose LLM (cloud vs on-device), pick hosting (serverless function or local worker), and scaffold UI (tiny web page or bookmarklet).
  2. Day 2 — Clipboard ingestion: Implement clipboard read, test with real group chat snippets, and add a basic parser to extract candidate restaurants.
  3. Day 3 — Normalize & enrich: Deduplicate, normalize names, optionally hit a places API for coordinates and metadata (price level, categories). Consider caching enrichments in IndexedDB and read practical caching patterns in the Behind the Edge playbook.
  4. Day 4 — Prompt engineering: Build the scoring prompt and few-shot examples that make the LLM return compact JSON with scores and reasoning.
  5. Day 5 — LLM integration: Wire front-end to your LLM endpoint, iterate prompt, lock temperature and response format for deterministic scores. If you're evaluating on-device options, the edge AI & on-device signals notes are useful background.
  6. Day 6 — UX and paste-back: Format ranked output for chat, add clipboard write, keyboard shortcuts, and mobile support (PWA/bookmarklet). For quick component options and micro-UI patterns, check the component marketplace.
  7. Day 7 — Test, secure & templateize: Add encryption for local storage, dev/test cases, exportable template, and documentation so teammates can reuse the micro-app. For privacy-by-design patterns in APIs and local storage, see Privacy by Design for TypeScript APIs.

Core technical blueprint

1) Clipboard ingestion (browser-first)

Use the browser Clipboard API to read text. Keep reading synchronous to minimize friction when users paste suggestions into chat.

// readClipboard.js
async function readClipboard() {
  try {
    const text = await navigator.clipboard.readText();
    return text || '';
  } catch (err) {
    console.warn('Clipboard read failed', err);
    return '';
  }
}

2) Extracting candidates from chat snippets

Group chats are messy. Use a layered parser:

  • Step 1: Simple regex to guess lines with capitalized words or place-like tokens
  • Step 2: NLP entity extraction (lightweight, eg. spaCy or a tiny on-device model) to identify restaurants
  • Step 3: Deduplicate with fuzzy matching
// simple parser (illustrative)
function parseCandidates(rawText) {
  const lines = rawText.split(/\n|;|,|\.|—/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(Boolean);
  const candidates = new Set();
  lines.forEach(line => {
    // heuristic: names with capitalized words or known tokens like 'Cafe', 'Bar'
    if (/([A-Z][a-z]+(\s|$)){1,4}/.test(line)) candidates.add(line);
  });
  return Array.from(candidates);
}

3) Optional enrichment

To improve scoring, enrich candidates with place metadata (distance, cuisine tags, price level). Use a places API (Mapbox, Google Places, or an open alternative). Cache enrichments locally to save calls — see examples from field pop-up kit workflows for practical caching patterns used in lightweight offline-first tools.

4) Prompt engineering for robust scoring

Your prompt determines deterministic, parsable output. Ask the LLM to return strict JSON (no chatter), include numeric scores, and a short reason. Use a small set of few-shot examples showing input and desired JSON output. Lock sampling parameters to low temperature for consistent scoring.

Prompt design goals: deterministic JSON, 1–100 scoring, short rationales, tags for vibe (e.g., "cozy", "quick", "cheap").

{
  "system": "You are a scoring assistant. Given a list of candidate restaurants and a group chat context, return a JSON array where each item has {name, score, reason, tags}. Score 1-100. Output only valid JSON.",
  "user": "Context: 'We want something cozy and not too expensive, near downtown, some vegetarians.' Candidates: ['Nori Sushi', 'Baker's Table', 'The Green Bowl']. Examples: ..."
}

Example few-shot examples (in prompt)

// inside the prompt's examples section
Input: Context: 'casual drinks, late night, walking distance' Candidates: ['Moon Bar', 'Quick Bites']
Output: [{"name":"Moon Bar","score":85,"reason":"Late-night drinks, close by; fits vibe","tags":["late-night","drinks"]},
{"name":"Quick Bites","score":60,"reason":"Good for quick food but not drinks-heavy","tags":["fast","food"]}]

5) Expected LLM response schema

[
  {
    "name": "Baker's Table",
    "score": 92,
    "reason": "Cozy atmosphere, vegetarian options, affordable",
    "tags": ["cozy","vegetarian","affordable"]
  },
  ...
]

Integration patterns: serverless vs on-device

Pick your execution model based on privacy and latency needs:

  • Serverless LLM (fast to build): Proxy the browser request to a serverless endpoint that calls the model API. Easy to integrate external places APIs and to log for analytics.
  • On-device LLM (privacy-first): Use a small quantized model or local runtime (WebGPU/WebNN) to run scoring in the browser or a companion app — ideal if the clipboard contains sensitive details. For deeper reading on edge AI and on-device models, see Edge AI at the platform level.

Example architecture (minimal)

  • Frontend: small HTML/CSS/JS page + clipboard read/write
  • Serverless endpoint: receives parsed list + context, calls LLM, returns JSON
  • Optional enrichment: places API + local cache (IndexedDB)

Simple fetch to a serverless LLM endpoint

async function scoreCandidates(endpoint, context, candidates) {
  const res = await fetch(endpoint, {
    method: 'POST',
    headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
    body: JSON.stringify({ context, candidates })
  });
  if (!res.ok) throw new Error('LLM scoring failed');
  return res.json();
}

Prompt engineering checklist (quick wins)

  • Return strict JSON — make parsing trivial.
  • Score range: 1–100 or 0–10. Larger ranges give more granularity.
  • Few-shot: give 3–5 examples covering different contexts (dietary, price, distance).
  • Temperature: set to 0–0.2 for consistent results.
  • Limit tokens to prevent verbose rationales. Ask for one-sentence reasons.

No-code alternatives

If you prefer no-code, you can assemble the same flow with visual builders and LLM connectors:

  • Use a clipboard-reading browser extension that forwards text to Make/Integromat or Zapier.
  • In the automation, run a parsing step (regular expression module), call an LLM action with a JSON response template, and write the output back via a clipboard write module or send as chat message webhook — many of the integration patterns are similar to those shown in the real-time collaboration APIs playbook.
  • Many no-code LLM tools in 2025–26 added options to force JSON output and schema validation, which speeds integration.

UX: how to paste results back cleanly

Offer two output modes:

  • Compact paste: 3–5 ranked options, each with score and 8–12 word rationale — perfect for chat.
  • Expanded paste: full JSON for power users or integrations (webhooks, sheets).

Provide a single-click copy button that writes the selected mode to clipboard via navigator.clipboard.writeText(). Make sure to sanitize before writing to avoid accidental metadata leaks. If you run micro-events or local pop-ups that rely on lightweight power and connectivity, tooling from compact smart plug kits and solar pop-up kits illustrates pragmatic UX constraints for field workflows.

Privacy & security best practices (critical for clipboard workflows)

  • Never log raw clipboard text in production logs. Use hashed IDs for telemetry.
  • If the app stores snippets, encrypt with the Web Crypto API and keep keys local to the device — follow privacy-by-design principles when you implement local storage and key management.
  • When using cloud LLMs, warn users and provide an option to run scoring locally.
  • Follow least-privilege: ask for clipboard permission only when needed and explain why.

Testing and iteration

Test with realistic chat samples from friends and communities. Collect failure cases where parsing misidentifies a suggestion or the LLM mis-scores due to ambiguous context. Iterate the prompt and add post-processing rules (e.g., treat explicit "no sushi" as a hard veto).

Advanced features to add after launch

  • Personalized preference learning: learn user tastes from past accepted picks and weight scores accordingly.
  • Collaborative scoring: allow multiple teammates to upvote or downvote picks and re-run the scoring with group weights.
  • Contextual map integration: factor in real-time travel time (transit/walking) to filter options by travel tolerance.
  • Automated follow-ups: paste the top choice plus an RSVP template into chat.

Real-world example: sample prompt (copy-and-adapt)

System: You are a scoring assistant that returns only JSON.
User: Context: 'Outing this Friday — casual, vegetarian-friendly, budget-friendly, downtown.'
Candidates: ["Spice Garden", "Pizza Luna", "Salad Lab"]
Return: [{"name":"Salad Lab","score":90,"reason":"Strong vegetarian options, casual, affordable","tags":["vegetarian","casual","cheap"]}, ...]

Why micro-app templates matter for creators

Micro-apps are powerful because they solve a narrow, immediate pain in a way that integrates with existing workflows. For content creators, influencers, and small teams, a clipboard-centric dining micro-app reduces decision friction and preserves context where it matters — the chat. Templates accelerate onboarding, and by 2026 we've seen a surge of creators sharing lightweight, privacy-conscious micro-apps that stay useful without becoming productized bloat.

Template distribution and reuse

Package your micro-app as a template with three components:

  • Manifest.json: lists dependencies, prompts, and default parameters.
  • Prompt bundle: system + few-shot examples + schema.
  • Starter front-end: clipboard read/write, parsing module, and a small UI.

Provide import/export so teammates can tweak prompts or switch to their preferred LLM without rewriting the app. If you plan to move between hosting modes or perform a structured migration, the cloud migration checklist shows common operational steps for safer transitions.

Developer notes & pitfalls

  • Beware hallucinations: constrain the model and validate against enrichment sources where possible.
  • Clipboard content varies by platform and language — include internationalization tests.
  • Keep the parser forgiving; LLMs can be resilient, but structured prompts reduce ambiguity.

Future predictions (late 2026 outlook)

Expect these trends to matter for micro-app builders:

  • Stronger on-device models will make private scoring the default for sensitive workflows.
  • Clipboard APIs will standardize cross-device sync and permissions, removing friction for clipboard-first micro-apps.
  • Composable prompt templates — community-driven prompt repositories will let creators jack in scoring rubrics without re-engineering prompts.

Actionable takeaways

  • Start small: implement clipboard read, parse 3–10 real chat snippets, and iterate the scoring prompt.
  • Force JSON output from the LLM and set temperature low for predictable rankings.
  • Prioritize privacy: let users choose on-device scoring or encrypted serverless endpoints.
  • Package as a template: include manifest, prompts, and a lightweight front-end for reuse.

Get the template and next steps

If you want to skip the boilerplate, download the reusable dining micro-app template (prompt bundle, starter front-end, and manifest) and adapt it to your team’s preferences. The template includes ready-made prompts, sample chat cases, and guidance to swap in any LLM.

Build your own decision-making micro-app this week — and stop losing great restaurant suggestions to chat chaos.

Call to action

Ready to prototype? Grab the dining micro-app template on clipboard.top/templates/dining-microapp, try it with five group chats this week, and share your improvements. If you prefer, fork the template and swap in your preferred LLM or on-device runtime — then drop your experience in the comments so other creators can iterate faster.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#micro-apps#templates#automation
c

clipboard

Contributor

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement
2026-01-25T04:27:55.035Z